The New Literacy

I can’t get Ryan Seacrest out of my head.http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/9/9f/Twitter_bird_logo_2012.svg/200px-Twitter_bird_logo_2012.svg.png

He is ubiquitous; he is everywhere and seems to own everything. I turn on the radio, and there he is. I flip on prime-time and he is there. I ring in the new year watching him smile and nod at a variety of musicians and celebrities. Then I heard that he was pegged to cover the ‘social media’ angle of the Olympics for NBC’s 2012 coverage and it came together: Ryan Seacrest represents the new literacy.

I recently read an article on CNN by John D. Sutter entitled Welcome to the Twitter Olympics. In it, he discusses the important and questionable role that Twitter has played in the 2012 Olympic games. He cites a few staggering statistics. To wit: there were more tweets during a single day last week than in the entire Beijing Olympics. 3.5 million tweets  mentioned the Olympics during its opening weekend in July.

Undoubtedly, these numbers represent a vast web of communication and an unprecedented level of interactivity. We have  examples of athletes tweeting about sports announcers, fans tweeting to athletes, leaks of the opening ceremony, and even the controversial Rule #40, banning athletes from using social media to endorse companies other than official Olympic sponsors. A Swiss soccer player was recently thrown out of the Olympic games because of racist tweets after a loss. Even President Obama has connected with Michael Phelps and the Women’s Gymnastics Team to offer words of encouragement.

I’m sure many of these tweets are useless or even senseless. I know many are rude, insensitive, hurtful. However, they certainly are powerful. One cannot ignore the vast scope of interaction that is taking place. This is a foray into social networking and interactive media revolving around one of the biggest world-wide spectacles. It is taking place in a vacuum with few rules and unlimited potential. It is both beautiful and horrific.

This is my point: the new literacy is everywhere; it’s got fingers in every pie. It never sleeps. It will happily criticize, bully, inspire, or just nod its head an smile on new year’s eve. The new literacy is Ryan Seacrest.

Scared? What do you expect? This is new territory. This is a new medium. This is participatory. This is communication. The new literacy has the ability to organize protests, change politics, instigate mob mentality, and offer a podium for hate and fear. The power is there, for better or worse.

As teachers, our job is changing. We have a responsibility understand the implications of such a drastic shift as much for ourselves as for our students. Being stewards of the new literacy will involve questioning our own lessons and practice. It will involve sharing what we do. It will involve taking criticism and working in real time with a global authentic audience of peers. It will blur the lines between teacher and student. But one thing is for certain, in needs to happen, because I don’t think Ryan Seacrest is going anywhere.

Share

4 Comments

Filed under Re-Defining Literacy

4 Responses to The New Literacy

  1. Pingback: The Changing Nature of Literacy | digitalliteracynh.org
    Twitter:

  2. SY
    Twitter:

    Clearly these tools have a huge potential to improve literacy. (I use the term to mean mastery of a subject or, more generally, all subjects). Unfortunately, their promise has not yet been fulfilled. The number of people believing in ghosts or that the earth is 4000 years old continues to rise…

    In part the very ease of access to information is responsible. Before this technology became available, the learning process was to some extent self regulating. Because it took time to gather information, a lot of the sorting and reflection was done on the front end. Various intermediaries (teachers, editorialists, etc.) played a critical role in distilling and interpreting information and giving it context. There was, in the best cases, more intellectual uniformity between various subject areas. This ideal was part of the classical liberal education but also extended further into society.

    In the digital age, significant parts of the learning process (i.e. the transition from fact collection to literacy) have been lost (hopefully only temporarily). The rapid dissemination of information has bypassed the sorting steps leading to an ersatz literacy in which sound bites replace substance. All opinions, no matter how ridiculous, are given equal weight. Peer review is reserved for technical journals. The media, which once digested and interpreted information now presents only the ‘facts’ to audiences which are increasingly unable or unwilling to develop cogent (literate) positions . Language itself has changed. Not only is there a new vocabulary but jargon (IMO) has replaced traditional sentence structure. The result is like asking a carpenter to build a house without using tools.

    Hopefully the work you’re doing this year will tackle some of these issues and identify some creative methods for developing better pathways from digital media to genuine literacy. Not an easy task…

  3. Pingback: Twitter: A Story of Numbers | digitalliteracynh.org
    Twitter:

  4. Pingback: The False God of Objectivity | digitalliteracynh.org
    Twitter:




Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>